Connect with us


Philippine News Agency hit for using Dole pineapple logo for DOLE-related write-up



On August 11, the Philippine News Agency published an article about the rules governing holiday pays in 2018 as released by the Department of Labor and Employment, but what made the news controversial is the fact that they used the logo of Dole, the company that processes pineapples.

Image credit: Rappler

According to Rappler, PNA’s latest blunder was posted on its website on August 11, at 7:56pm. Netizens quickly took a screenshot of the mistake. Around two hours later, the PNA replaced the wrong logo with that of the government agency.

At around 11pm on August 11, two hours after it replaced the wrong photo, PNA issued an apology over the mistake, saying that the “accompanying photo was that of Dole Philippines,” admitting that using the wrong logo was a “careless act on the [part of the] PNA editorial staff.”

“In an effort to ensure that all stories are accompanied by a photo, the staff inadvertently attached the wrong photo rather than the logo of the Department of Labor and Employment,” said the PNA’s statement.


“Rest assured appropriate action is being taken in pursuit of the delivery of accurate information to our readers. Our apologies,” it added.

On August 6, the PNA was also in hot water for publishing a commentary article from the Xinhua News Agency, China’s state news agency, which described the Hague ruling as an “ill-founded award.” Netizens criticized the PNA for seemingly echoing China’s claims over the West Philippine Sea. Communications Secretary Martin Andanar has asked the state news agency to explain “why [it] should not be held liable for any administrative charges.”

The PNA was also criticized for using a Vietnam war photo in its Marawi-related article and for publishing a fake article about how 95 UN member states were convinced that there were no cases of extrajudicial killings in the Philippines.

In reaction to the use of their logo, Dole PH’s Facebook page reportedly threw shade at the PNA.

The Twitterverse reacted to PNA’s latest blunder.

“In another cock-up, PNA used the logo of Dole Pineapple for DOLE. Dutertenomics is now Dutertedelmontekitchenomics where everything is piña,” AltAsecMargauxUson tweeted.

Singer/activist Jim Paredes also weighed in on the issue.

“What does PNA stand for? Pro China News Agency or Pineapple News Agency? 2 strikes na kayo this week,” Paredes tweeted.

Former national security adviser Roilo Golez is asking if Dole and Xinhua are paying the PNA.

“PNA getting fees from DOLE Pineapple and Xinhua??” he tweeted.

One Twitter user has this theory: “Feeling ko yung nagpost ng wrong DOLE logo sa PNA ay galit sa boss nya or ayaw na sa work nya. Haha.”

Another one noted the possibility that the next mistake would involve US Senator Bob Dole.

“Lumakas ba sales ng Dole ngayon? #PNA,” one Twitter user wrote.

Pro-Duterte blogger Sass Rogando Sasot didn’t forget about Comelec chair Andres Bautista’s issue amid the Dole logo controversy.

“Andy’s passbooks vs PNA’s DOLE pineapple as DOLE (gov’t agency) logo…Guess which one the disenteng dilaws waste their time on…PAK!” Sasot tweeted.

Others surmised it is free promotion for Dole.

“Dear #Dole: you should thank PNA for the free #brand awareness campaign. You’re all over Twitter since yesterday. #branding #advertising,” @JustCatellon said.

Here are other reactions to the issue on social media:

Andanar said that he has warned two PNA editors that they will be sent to Jolo or Basilan should they fail to explain the agency’s latest mistakes.

“If they will not give an adequate justification to avoid disciplinary action, then I will send them to Basilan or Jolo,” Andanar told reporters in Baguio City on August 13.

Andanar said they would have a meeting on August 14.

“Sa Monday magmi-meeting kami. In fact kagabi pa lang nag-meeting na kami sa telepono,” he added.

The editors would be subjected to an internal investigation.

Pag nakitaan po sila ng malaking pagkakamali or talagang sinadya po nila, kung hindi po sila makapagpaliwanag ng husto (If we see that it was just a grave mistake or it was intentional, or if they can’t fully explain themselves), then they would have to face disciplinary action. They would also have to, maybe, be suspended, be warned, be axed, depending on the result of the investigation,” Andanar said.

“Hindi naman natin pwedeng pabayaan ito. They were already given the chance,” he further said.

Sources: ( , )



Netizens slam Duterte for saying women ‘could not stand threats and intimidation’



President Rodrigo Duterte drew flak for another controversial comment involving women after he remarked on May 24 that women “could not stand threats and intimidation.”

Duterte said that while he believed in women’s competence, it does not necessarily ring true in all aspects of life.

“I believe in the woman, the competence and capability, pero hindi lahat sa buhay dapat.Hindi ka, hindi, hindi. Dapat lang. It’s not appropriate when you cannot stand threats and intimidation,” he said in his May 24 speech.

He also said that women should be “prim and proper” and talked about his reservation in sending women police and soldiers to the field because unlike men, they did not grow up with a mindset that involves violence.

“Ang mga babae, sundalo pati pulis, ayaw ko ‘yan sa bukid. Unlike men kami, maliit pa lang, suntukan, bakbakan, barilan. And we grew up with a sort of a mindset na sometimes prone to violence. Itong mga babae, prim and proper man ‘yan, isang tingin lang sa nanay niyan, wala na tunaw na ‘yan. Tapos gawin mong pulis, ipaaway mo doon. Naku,” Duterte remarked.

Netizens then took to social media to react to Duterte’s most recent statements, making #BabaeAko trend again on Twitter.

“Mr. President, you just horrifyingly disrespected your own mother who bravely fought against the Marcos dictatorship. She withstood threats and intimidation. Siya ay babae! #BabaeAko,” a Twitter user remarked.

Forensic expert Dr. Raquel Fortun spoke out, too, saying “I am threatened and intimidated a lot. All my life. Don’t me. #BabaeAko.”

So did film and theater actress Chai Fonacier, who said, “Encouraging women — and I mean including those who identify as women — and our friends from the entire spectrum to share your #BabaeAko statements to fight the misogyny that the President and his ilk normalize through their behavior. Make them remember the feminine strength.”

KABATAAN Partylist Rep. Sarah Elago also reacted, saying she refused to be stereotyped.

Former Solicitor General Florin Hilbay urged other Filipinos to protest against Duterte’s misogynistic statements.

Other Twitter users weighed in on the issue.

Duterte’s previous misogynistic remarks


His remarks in his speech on May 24 seemed to have sought to explain another controversial remark he made on May 16 when he said that he did not want a politician, especially a woman, to become the next Ombudsman.

“Mag-nominate sila, pero I choose, but gusto ko ‘yung bilib ang tao sa integrity niya. Of course it could not be a politician, lalo na hindi babae,” he said during a chance interview.

This gave birth to the launching of the #BabaeAko movement on social media on May 21 by women activists and other people who also want to protest Duterte’s misogynistic and sexist statements.

One of  the women who joined the #BabaeAko campaign was former Social Welfare Secretary Judy Taguiwalo who said, “Akala ko taumbayan ang boss ni Duterte. Yun pala sina Marcos, Gloria, Trump at China. Para sa bayang makatarungan at malaya, lalaban ako.”

In February, he was also slammed for telling his audience of former NPA rebels that he told his soldiers to shoot female rebels in the vagina.

Sources: ( )


Continue Reading


New DOT chief to ask Montano why he rushed official New York engagement to watch Broadway show



Newly installed Department of Tourism (DOT) Secretary Bernadette Romulo-Puyat said she plans on talking with Tourism Promotions Board (TPB) COO Cesar Montano to ask for his side on certain accusations that were hurled against him.

Among these accusations came from an Abante report where Montano was said to have rushed a speaking engagement staged by the DOT in New York to watch the Broadway musical show “Hamilton.”

DOT reportedly launched the Philippine Tourism Presentation and Dinner Reception on May 9 to showcase Philippine tourism and fashion at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York. Montano was introduced as the event’s keynote speaker, but he was said to have only spoken for a bit before hurriedly leaving the venue, disappointing the guests, which also included US officials.

Montano was said to have been invited to the event in behalf of the now-resigned Tourism Secretary Wanda Teo. He was also named as one of the two hosts, the other being Teo, of the said event.

In reaction to this report about Montano, Puyat said she would talk to Montano as well as the Tourism attache and other DOT officials who attended the event to verify the accusation in the report mentioned above.


Puyat said that she would investigate into the “Buhay Carinderia” program that the TPB is set to implement. This was after Philippine Star Boo Chanco accused Montano of issuing P80-million worth of three checks to the event proponent and organizer.

“I still don’t have the papers. I will be asking [and] will be arranging a meeting with Mr. Cesar Montano to ask about ‘yung mga nabasa ko sa ‘Buhay Carinderia’ – kung totoo ba na walang bidding ‘yung P80 million na advance,” Puyat said on May 15.

“I’m planning to talk to him and ask his side. I want to ask all those who were there if it actually happened,” Puyat added.

In March 2017, TPB employees filed a complaint against Montano for his alleged corruption and mismanagement of the agency. These include hiring friends and relatives, using TPB’s funds for personal trips, and showing incompetence in fulfilling his obligations as the agency’s COO.

Sources: ( )


Continue Reading


Eldest Tulfo vows to help Wanda clear her name, berates ‘black sheep’ Ben over controversial P60-M DOT ad deal



Inquirer columnist Ramon Tulfo spoke up about the controversy involving his siblings, now resigned Tourism Secretary Wanda Tulfo-Teo and hosts Ben and Erwin Tulfo, over the P60 million tourism ad deal.

The eldest Tulfo wrote in his Inquirer column on May 10 that while President Rodrigo Duterte himself advised the Tulfo family to avoid talking to the media, he took it upon himself as the family’s acting patriarch to tell the story behind the controversy.

First up, Ramon blamed Teo for not hiring smart staff members who could have advised her against inking a deal with PTV 4, where one of the Tulfo brothers, Ben, was a blocktimer.

As a blocktimer, Ben pays for his TV show’s airtime on the state-run channel.

According to Ramon, Wanda was only complying with President Duterte’s injunction for his Cabinet secretaries to support PTV 4, adding that she did not know Ben’s company would get most of the multimillion advertising contract with DOT.

He also hit Ben, whom he called a “black sheep” with a “middle child” syndrome as the fifth child out of 10 siblings, for signing the P60-million advertising contract with PTV 4 despite knowing that there would be a conflict of interest on Wanda’s part.

Ramon also said that Wanda still tried to save Ben, who insisted on his innocence amid the controversy, leading her to resign from her post. He also explained that Wanda seemed to have forgotten the fact that her husband was on the board of director of the Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority (Tieza), a part of DOT, when Duterte appointed her as tourism chief. He added that it should have been up to her husband to step down from his post upon his wife’s appointment.


In the same column, he also slammed Wanda’s lawyer, Ferdinand Topacio, whom he said did not even consult the Tulfo brothers on returning the P60-million funds from the ad deal. He also described the lawyer as “all talk,” a counsel who’s only focused on gaining publicity for himself.

Unlike what has been previously reported about Wanda resigning out of delicadeza amid the controversy, Ramon let it slip that he commended President Duterte for “sacking Wanda,” prompting some people to ask whether Wanda was fired instead of resigned.

Before he ended his column, he vowed to support “Wanda’s fight to clear her name, but not Ben’s.”
Wanda resigned on May 8 to show delicadeza and to spare everyone, especially Duterte, from the pain caused by the controversy, according to her lawyer.

The issue started with the Commission on Audit’s report showing the DOT paying P60 million worth of commercials to PTV 4, which in turn, tapped Ben’s Bitag Media Unlimited Inc. to air the tourism ads during Ben and Erwin’s show “Kilos Pronto.”

Malacañang said that Teo’s resignation does not mean that she is off the hook since the Ombudsman is still looking into her and other government officials involved in the controversial ad deal.

Sources: ( , )


Continue Reading

What Others Read