Connect with us


Busted: University of San Carlos students in Cebu WERE NOT forced to join rally vs. death penalty



The University of San Carlos held noise barrage rallies in all five campuses in Cebu on March 16, but the protest became even more controversial when a Facebook page posted photos of university students claiming they only joined the rally for the sake of getting their attendance checked.

Facebook page “Cebu Flash Report” posted photos of USC students holding up a sign that said “Attendance Ray Amoa.” The post, however, was already taken down by the page, but a netizen managed to get a screenshot of it.

The USC Supreme Student Council (SSC) president Deodatus Paolo Burgos called out Cebu Flash Report for posting the “misleading” and accused the page of “insulting the freedom of speech and expression” exercised by the university students who participated in the noise barrage.

He said participation in the rally was “not compulsory.”

“Good evening Cebu Flash Report! This is Deo Burgos a Political Science student and the President of SSC. I am just concerned on your recent post about the Noise Barrage conducted by the different stakeholders of the University. I would like to respectfully point out that your post is misleading since at the outset, we reminded students that the activity was not compulsory,” Burgos said in his post.

“They were only encouraged to join the protest,” he added.

He also directed Cebu Flash Report to the official Facebook page of the USC SSC for more information about the memo “encouraging” students to join the noise barrage.

We found this post on the USC Supreme Student Council Facebook page about the noise barrage.

Burgos then urged Cebu Flash Report to “correct” the misleading information, adding that the page should “report with truth.”

“Hope you are giving genuine interests because for us, you are insulting the freedom of speech and expression manifested by the students who joined the Noise Barrage,” he said.

“Please ask us the right questions before insulting our democratic efforts,” he added.

Before Burgos even took to Facebook, another netizen, Ara Allego, wrote a post in an effort to “clarify and correct a few things” about how “narrow-minded” people see rallies initiated by students.

She emphasized the fact that students were not forced to join the protest.


“Some people are saying that “para na sa grado, hagbungon kung dili muapil, requirement sa clearance”. Let me correct you by saying that these students/individuals rallying are NOT being forced to do so. They attended the rally NOT FOR GRADES, NOT FOR CLEARANCES, NOR FOR THE FEAR OF FAILING, BUT TO EXPRESS THEIR STAND!! THEY ARE SIMPLY EXERCISING THEIR RIGHT TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH (it is CLEARLY stipulated under our present constitution Art III,Sec.4 NO LAW SHALL BE PASSED ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH),” she wrote.

She argued that if the attendance at the USC rally was indeed required, the number of attendees would have been so much higher.

Allego also pointed out that those who wanted to express their opinions can hold their own rally.

“Respect begets respect. If you want to voice out your opinion, make a rally on your own. Not by attacking the individual personally,” she said.

USC alumnus Jaemar Abangan said that a friend of those students pictured holding up the sign that they only protested “for attendance” reached out to him and explained what really happened as to why those photos were taken.

The said friend explained that he and his friends were pro-death penalty but they joined the rally, shouting nonsensical things. He added that the friend who was wearing shades was the one who wrote the controversial sign and forced him and his friends to hold it for photos, but he said no. He said that he did not expect his other friends to say yes to their shades-wearing friend.

The USC students’ noise barrage started at noon on March 16. The organizers said that there weren’t that many participants but added that they want their little voice to count in the fight against the reinstatement of the death penalty in the country.

Fr. Anthony Salas, USC’s vice president for academic affairs, read a statement that said that the school wants the Congress and Senate to know that they are against the “measures that rush and truncate democratic processes.”

“The University of San Carlos appreciates the Filipino people’s desire for meaningful and decisive change. However, measures that rush and truncate democratic processes essentially deny people the participation demanded by their dignity,” the university’s statement read.

“If public policy process is to achieve the common good, it must acknowledge that respect for the dignity of every human being is not a concession but a right,” the statement further read.

Fr. Salas said that the USC opposes Duterte administration’s plans to lower the minimum age of criminal liability from 15 to nine years old. He added that the noise barrage was not compulsory as the university administration respected the opinion of the students who did not agree with the university officials’ stand on the death penalty and other current issues.
Source: ( )

Be Informed. Beat the Trolls, Share the Truth!



Busted: Robredo wants to add years to the K-to-12 program? It’s fake news!



Vice President Leni Robredo’s office released a statement debunking social media posts claiming that she wants to add a few more years to the K-to-12 program. This came after several posts started circulating about how Robredo allegedly said that she wanted to add a few more years to the K-to-12 program, angering netizens.

A certain tweet on March 1, 2020 showed the vice president’s photo along with these words: “Kulang ang K to 12 education system natin. Kelangan apat na taon sa Junior HS at apat na taon sa Senior HS.”

In January 17, the same image shared to the Facebook page “Raffy Tulfo In Action Supporters” also got shared over 6,000 times and triggered negative comments among the netizens.

Many social media users have lambasted Robredo over the said meme.

The unwarranted bashing and adverse reactions prompted her office to release an official statement debunking this false claim.

“Hindi totoong pinadadagdagan ni VP Leni Robredo ang mga taon sa K-to-12 program,” said the vice president’s office in a statement.

“Suportado ng Bise Presidente kung sakaling magkaroon ng review ng nasabing programa. Binibigyang-diin niya na kailangang siguraduhin na may tamang facilities at equipment ang mga specialized tracks, para mas maging madali ang pagtuturo nito at matiyak ang kahandaang makapagtrabaho ng mga mag-aaral sa kanilang pagtatapos,” it added.

In October 2019, Robredo did say that she was alright with reviewing how the K-to-12 program to determine how it could be further improved.

“Tumutugon rin ang kaniyang Tanggapan, kasama ang #AngatBuhay partners nito, sa pangangailangan ng tamang kagamitan. Nakapagbigay na ng kaukulang tools at equipment sa mga mahihirap na paaralan, gaya sa Mulanay sa Quezon, Panglao sa Bohol, at Sta. Maria sa Romblon,” the statement further said.

This is not the first time Robredo has been a victim of fake news. There were false claims, misleading headlines, and edited images or captions about how former Senator Bongbong Marcos has already won over Robredo, how she met former UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon to oust President Rodrigo Duterte, or how her portrait was sold on eBay, something that a popular blogger apologized for.

Sources: ( , )

Continue Reading


Busted: Walang kasalanan ang Tulfo brothers ayon sa imbestigasyon? It’s a misleading headline!



An article has claimed that an investigation has found the Tulfo brothers to be not guilty. It says, “Lumabas Sa Imbestigasyon Na Walang Kasalanan Ang Tulfo Brothers,” as published by the website

The story was even shared by Facebook pages “Ferdinand Emmanual Edralin Marcos” and “Rody Duterte MEDIA.”

However, the article merely contained a 10-minute YouTube video, which was a mix several video clips of different reports, some parts of which touched on the issues involving the P60 million tourism ads that aired on the PTV program of Teo’s brothers, the Tulfos.

One of the video clips showed that the CNN Philippines reported on why nepotism is considered corruption and abused of authority in the case of now-resigned Tourism Secretary Wanda and how her husband, Roberto Teo, served as the board member of the Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority (TIEZA). But Roberto was appointed by former President Benigno Aquino III and has tendered his resignation from TIEZA effective June 30, 2018.


Another video clip showing a CNN Philippines report of a Malacañang press briefing, where a reporter asked Presidential Spokesperon Harry Roque if Communications Secretary Martin Andanar would be among those investigated in the controversial placement of P60 million worth of tourism ads on the program of the Tulfos, who are Teo’s brothers, leading people to raise the issue of conflict of interest. As the PCOO chief, he also supervises the state-run PTV-4, where the Tulfos’ programs are a blocktimer.

Asked by yet another reporter what President Rodrigo Duterte’s comment was on the issue with the DOT and the Tulfos, Roque said that he did not know then because he had not talked to the President for a while and the investigation conducted by the Office of the President was ongoing then.

The headline used in the video is misleading. It meant to make people think that the Tulfo brothers have been cleared from the issue involving them with the controversial P60-million tourism ad deal.

However, reports showed that even after Teo resigned from her post on May 7, the Ombudsman will still continue with the probe into the scandal. The body requested from the Commission on Audit (COA) a copy of its DOT report involving the controversial P60-million worth of payments for ads aired on PTV on May 8. The investigation is still ongoing, which meant that they it has not yet cleared the Tulfos.

Executive Secretary Salvador Medialdea is also said to be investigating the scandal to determine the officials at fault at the DOT, People’s Television Network Inc. (PTNI), and the PCOO.

Ramon Tulfo, an Inquirer columnist, came out in the defense of his sister Teo and blamed  his younger brother Ben Tulfo for the controversy.

Party-list group Akbayan, however, said it was not enough for Teo to step down from her post. They wanted her to be prosecuted.

“The simple firing or resignation of corrupt officials will not put a stop to corruption in the government if this is not followed by swift prosecution and conviction,” the group said in a statement.

Akbayan also challenged President Duterte to file cases against Ben and Erwin Tulfo over the controversial ad transaction. Ben owns Bitag Media, which produced the PTV show “Kilos Pronto,” the program where the DOT ads were aired. His brother, Erwin, co-hosts the show with him.

Sources: ( , , , , , )


Continue Reading


Busted: Legarda sinumbatan si Robredo na mag-resign bago pa lumabas ang resulta na panalo si Marcos? Misleading headline!



Senator Loren Legarda allegedly confronted Vice President Leni Robredo and asked her to resign before the results would show former Senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. as the winner.

The video was posted by blog on May 15, 2018. The vice presidential vote recount is still ongoing, so the headline must have been referring to the result of the recount. It also made it seem as though Legarda is telling Robredo that she is certain that Marcos would emerge as the winner in the recount.

The YouTube video is 20-minute long and Legarda’s face was immediately shown at the beginning of the video. However, if you finish watching it, you’d know immediately that the video was not taken recently. In fact, it showed a portion of the budget hearing for 2017 for the Office of the Vice President. Further research showed that the hearing was conducted in front of the Senate panel on August 22, 2017 and it lasted less than an hour before it was approved. Robredo herself attended the budget hearing to present an overview of the OVP’s plans for 2018.

Legarda served as the Senate panel’s chair.

During the hearing, Robredo reported how the OVP spent its funds, mainly for poverty alleviation.


The Philippine Daily Inquirer reported that following the presentation on the fund allocation of the OVP, Legarda asked Robredo to send them a yearlong report on the needs of the sectors and areas that the OVP has reached while promising to help out on fulfilling those needs.

So unlike what the headline claimed, Legarda did not tell Robredo to resign from her VP post to make way for Marcos’ imminent victory. The headline is misleading and is merely playing with people’s emotions and gullibility.

However, Facebook page “Sara Duterte Worldwide Supporters” still shared it without verifying the headline’s claims.

There have been several fake stories involving Marcos and Robredo and the VP vote recount that we have busted. We debunked a misleading headline claiming that Marcos has already won, that Marcos won by 1,786 votes over Robredo, that Robredo would perform her tasks as VP until Marcos takes over, and that Marcos will replace Robredo.

Sources: ( )


Continue Reading

What Others Read