Connect with us


Son of Robredo’s friend denies accusations of ‘unexplained wealth,’ calls #NagaLeaks ‘tabloid’ article



The son of one of the personalities mentioned in #NagaLeaks reacted to the leaks’ story about his father and denied his family’s accumulation of “unexplained wealth,” while dismissing the story as mere “cheap article meant for tabloids” for lack of evidence.

The document released by a group called “We Are Collective as an expose of the Robredo’s alleged deception, is William Del Rosario Sr. It accused the older Del Rosario of benefiting from his friendship with the late interior secretary Jesse Robredo after enjoying “new found wealth.”

Del Rosario’s son, his namesake, took to Facebook to react to Collective’s allegations.

He started off with identifying “possible mistakes” in #NagaLeaks, where he denied his family’s “new found wealth” or “unexplained wealth.”

“1) One of Robredo’s men who enjoyed new found wealth because of this friendship was William Del Rosario…
– The crux of the case given is the proof of ‘new found wealth’ or ‘unexplained wealth’. The statement offers the conclusion first before providing evidence.”

The younger Del Rosario, however, said that at least the Collective got the Robredo family home’s address in Brgy. Dayangdang and the fact that the Del Rosarios’ first business was selling meat products at the public market before his father got elected as barangay chairman.

However, he shot back at We Are Collective for claiming that his father is a part of the secret companies that Robredo owned.

“4)…Later on he would become part of several companies secretly owned by Jesse Robredo that traded consumer goods and poultry products.
– Huh? Unless Jesse Robredo owned CDO and/or San Miguel Corp., this allegation is baseless.
– Also, assuming this is true, ano naman?
– Bill of Particulars: Ano issue? Yung legitimacy ba ng companies? Or yung trading consumer goods? As long as legitimate ang transactions (di naman drugs), again, ano issue?”

He also showed a glimpse of his father and Robredo’s friendship in an anecdote of how his father refused to stay with Robredo in Manila when the latter was appointed as Interior Secretary.

“5) Of course under the circumstances, William was no less than Jesse’s dummy…
– HAHAHA. They were really close. When Jesse Robredo was appointed Secretary and had to stay in Manila he asked my dad to come visit him because he missed Naga. To which my dad replied, ‘eh parehas tayong makakamiss sa Naga? mag-isa ka jan.’ This anecdote is a testament to how Tito Jesse valued my dad’s friendship and my dad’s poor character as a friend. Hahahaha.”


As for how the older Del Rosario has become the “envy of his peers” for his wealth, his son said that he does not really know anything about that.

“6)…but he enjoyed a level of wealth and comfort that made him the envy of his peers.
– I’m not sure. hahaha. Malay ko ba. Who goes around other people’s houses to check kung comfortable ba yung mga buhay nila juxtaposed to yours? hahaha. Ang lala.”

The younger Del Rosario then said that it “pained” him how the product of his family’s “hardships,” “hard work” and “a bit of good luck” was easily dismissed as “unexplained wealth,” adding that he still believed that his parents had a success story.

Without presenting evidence, he added, #NagaLeaks would simply be a “cheap article meant for tabloids and not the expose they intend it to be.”X Robredos friend denies accusations

“If this demolition job’s primary objective is to invalidate the good work Jesse Robredo has done for Naga City, and somehow associate it with Vice President Leni Robredo, by discrediting the people around him, the author/s of this ‘leak’ should do a better job. Evidence for each severed cause of action should be presented, otherwise it would only be a cheap article meant for tabloids and not the exposé they intend it to be.”

And then Del Rosario posed these three questions to We Are Collective:

“1) If it were up to you, civil, criminal or both?
2) Do you have properties my family and, perhaps, other families can levy for moral damages?
3) How do you sleep at night?”

His post on March 3, 3 hours after #NagaLeaks was published online, has gone viral. It has been shared 1, 211 times and has received 3,400 reactions, as of writing.

But We Are Collective also posted their reaction to Del Rosario’s take on #NagaLeaks. They warned him to simply wait because they are not done yet and they have yet to go in-depth in their expose, where the older Del Rosario is involved. They promised to give more details and fired back the same question he asked of them at him, something that they said he should ask his dad: “Daddy William how do you sleep at night?”

X Robredos friend denies accusations



Netizens slam Duterte for saying women ‘could not stand threats and intimidation’



President Rodrigo Duterte drew flak for another controversial comment involving women after he remarked on May 24 that women “could not stand threats and intimidation.”

Duterte said that while he believed in women’s competence, it does not necessarily ring true in all aspects of life.

“I believe in the woman, the competence and capability, pero hindi lahat sa buhay dapat.Hindi ka, hindi, hindi. Dapat lang. It’s not appropriate when you cannot stand threats and intimidation,” he said in his May 24 speech.

He also said that women should be “prim and proper” and talked about his reservation in sending women police and soldiers to the field because unlike men, they did not grow up with a mindset that involves violence.

“Ang mga babae, sundalo pati pulis, ayaw ko ‘yan sa bukid. Unlike men kami, maliit pa lang, suntukan, bakbakan, barilan. And we grew up with a sort of a mindset na sometimes prone to violence. Itong mga babae, prim and proper man ‘yan, isang tingin lang sa nanay niyan, wala na tunaw na ‘yan. Tapos gawin mong pulis, ipaaway mo doon. Naku,” Duterte remarked.

Netizens then took to social media to react to Duterte’s most recent statements, making #BabaeAko trend again on Twitter.

“Mr. President, you just horrifyingly disrespected your own mother who bravely fought against the Marcos dictatorship. She withstood threats and intimidation. Siya ay babae! #BabaeAko,” a Twitter user remarked.

Forensic expert Dr. Raquel Fortun spoke out, too, saying “I am threatened and intimidated a lot. All my life. Don’t me. #BabaeAko.”

So did film and theater actress Chai Fonacier, who said, “Encouraging women — and I mean including those who identify as women — and our friends from the entire spectrum to share your #BabaeAko statements to fight the misogyny that the President and his ilk normalize through their behavior. Make them remember the feminine strength.”

KABATAAN Partylist Rep. Sarah Elago also reacted, saying she refused to be stereotyped.

Former Solicitor General Florin Hilbay urged other Filipinos to protest against Duterte’s misogynistic statements.

Other Twitter users weighed in on the issue.

Duterte’s previous misogynistic remarks


His remarks in his speech on May 24 seemed to have sought to explain another controversial remark he made on May 16 when he said that he did not want a politician, especially a woman, to become the next Ombudsman.

“Mag-nominate sila, pero I choose, but gusto ko ‘yung bilib ang tao sa integrity niya. Of course it could not be a politician, lalo na hindi babae,” he said during a chance interview.

This gave birth to the launching of the #BabaeAko movement on social media on May 21 by women activists and other people who also want to protest Duterte’s misogynistic and sexist statements.

One of  the women who joined the #BabaeAko campaign was former Social Welfare Secretary Judy Taguiwalo who said, “Akala ko taumbayan ang boss ni Duterte. Yun pala sina Marcos, Gloria, Trump at China. Para sa bayang makatarungan at malaya, lalaban ako.”

In February, he was also slammed for telling his audience of former NPA rebels that he told his soldiers to shoot female rebels in the vagina.

Sources: ( )


Continue Reading


New DOT chief to ask Montano why he rushed official New York engagement to watch Broadway show



Newly installed Department of Tourism (DOT) Secretary Bernadette Romulo-Puyat said she plans on talking with Tourism Promotions Board (TPB) COO Cesar Montano to ask for his side on certain accusations that were hurled against him.

Among these accusations came from an Abante report where Montano was said to have rushed a speaking engagement staged by the DOT in New York to watch the Broadway musical show “Hamilton.”

DOT reportedly launched the Philippine Tourism Presentation and Dinner Reception on May 9 to showcase Philippine tourism and fashion at the Roosevelt Hotel in New York. Montano was introduced as the event’s keynote speaker, but he was said to have only spoken for a bit before hurriedly leaving the venue, disappointing the guests, which also included US officials.

Montano was said to have been invited to the event in behalf of the now-resigned Tourism Secretary Wanda Teo. He was also named as one of the two hosts, the other being Teo, of the said event.

In reaction to this report about Montano, Puyat said she would talk to Montano as well as the Tourism attache and other DOT officials who attended the event to verify the accusation in the report mentioned above.


Puyat said that she would investigate into the “Buhay Carinderia” program that the TPB is set to implement. This was after Philippine Star Boo Chanco accused Montano of issuing P80-million worth of three checks to the event proponent and organizer.

“I still don’t have the papers. I will be asking [and] will be arranging a meeting with Mr. Cesar Montano to ask about ‘yung mga nabasa ko sa ‘Buhay Carinderia’ – kung totoo ba na walang bidding ‘yung P80 million na advance,” Puyat said on May 15.

“I’m planning to talk to him and ask his side. I want to ask all those who were there if it actually happened,” Puyat added.

In March 2017, TPB employees filed a complaint against Montano for his alleged corruption and mismanagement of the agency. These include hiring friends and relatives, using TPB’s funds for personal trips, and showing incompetence in fulfilling his obligations as the agency’s COO.

Sources: ( )


Continue Reading


Eldest Tulfo vows to help Wanda clear her name, berates ‘black sheep’ Ben over controversial P60-M DOT ad deal



Inquirer columnist Ramon Tulfo spoke up about the controversy involving his siblings, now resigned Tourism Secretary Wanda Tulfo-Teo and hosts Ben and Erwin Tulfo, over the P60 million tourism ad deal.

The eldest Tulfo wrote in his Inquirer column on May 10 that while President Rodrigo Duterte himself advised the Tulfo family to avoid talking to the media, he took it upon himself as the family’s acting patriarch to tell the story behind the controversy.

First up, Ramon blamed Teo for not hiring smart staff members who could have advised her against inking a deal with PTV 4, where one of the Tulfo brothers, Ben, was a blocktimer.

As a blocktimer, Ben pays for his TV show’s airtime on the state-run channel.

According to Ramon, Wanda was only complying with President Duterte’s injunction for his Cabinet secretaries to support PTV 4, adding that she did not know Ben’s company would get most of the multimillion advertising contract with DOT.

He also hit Ben, whom he called a “black sheep” with a “middle child” syndrome as the fifth child out of 10 siblings, for signing the P60-million advertising contract with PTV 4 despite knowing that there would be a conflict of interest on Wanda’s part.

Ramon also said that Wanda still tried to save Ben, who insisted on his innocence amid the controversy, leading her to resign from her post. He also explained that Wanda seemed to have forgotten the fact that her husband was on the board of director of the Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority (Tieza), a part of DOT, when Duterte appointed her as tourism chief. He added that it should have been up to her husband to step down from his post upon his wife’s appointment.


In the same column, he also slammed Wanda’s lawyer, Ferdinand Topacio, whom he said did not even consult the Tulfo brothers on returning the P60-million funds from the ad deal. He also described the lawyer as “all talk,” a counsel who’s only focused on gaining publicity for himself.

Unlike what has been previously reported about Wanda resigning out of delicadeza amid the controversy, Ramon let it slip that he commended President Duterte for “sacking Wanda,” prompting some people to ask whether Wanda was fired instead of resigned.

Before he ended his column, he vowed to support “Wanda’s fight to clear her name, but not Ben’s.”
Wanda resigned on May 8 to show delicadeza and to spare everyone, especially Duterte, from the pain caused by the controversy, according to her lawyer.

The issue started with the Commission on Audit’s report showing the DOT paying P60 million worth of commercials to PTV 4, which in turn, tapped Ben’s Bitag Media Unlimited Inc. to air the tourism ads during Ben and Erwin’s show “Kilos Pronto.”

Malacañang said that Teo’s resignation does not mean that she is off the hook since the Ombudsman is still looking into her and other government officials involved in the controversial ad deal.

Sources: ( , )


Continue Reading

What Others Read